STOMP

Saturation Function Card Options (CO2E)

Saturation functions relate the gas-aqueous capillary pressure to aqueous, gas, and entrapped gas saturations. Model options and parameters for these functions are specified through the Saturation Function Card. Every rock/soil type defined on the Rock/Soil Zonation Card must be referenced. With the IJK Indexing option, node dependent parameters are entered via external files and node independent parameters are entered directly on the card. Functional forms for the saturation-capillary pressure functions are preferred; however, tabular input is acceptable. By default, tabular data will be interpolated using linear interpolation, whereas values beyond the table limits will be assigned either the table minimum or maximum values appropriately.

 

The "van Genuchten" option:
This option uses the van Genuchten (1980) retention function. 

 

 

 where m = 1-1/n. 

The "Brooks and Corey" option:

the Brooks and Corey (1966) retention is used.

 

The "Brooks and Corey" option:

the Brooks and Corey (1966) retention is used.

 

The "Fractured" (Dual porosity function) Option:

This option is used for a fractured medium. The retention properties for both the fracture and the matrix are needed.

Dual porosity functions or equivalent continuum models for aqueous-gas systems relate the gas-aqueous capillary pressure to the bulk aqueous saturation for fractured geologic media through two functions [Klavetter and Peters 1986; Nitao 1988]. One function relates the gas aqueous capillary pressure to the matrix aqueous saturation and the other relates the gas-aqueous capillary pressure to the fracture aqueous saturation. The pivotal assumption associated with the dual porosity function is that the fracture and matrix pressures are in equilibrium. This assumption neglects transient fracture-matrix interactions. Fracture and matrix effective saturations can be computed with either van Genuchten or Brooks and Corey functions above. The bulk aqueous saturation is computed by combining the fracture and matrix aqueous saturations and diffusive porosities:

 

 

where the actual saturations are computed from effective saturations, according to

 

The "Entrapment" (with Gas Entrapment) option:

This option considers entrapped gas that is immobile and also reduces the pore fraction for the mobile fluid.

A theoretical model for hysteretic saturation functions for aqueous-gas systems was developed by Parker and Lenhard [1987]. A simplified version of this model, analogous to Kaluarachchi and Parker [1992], has been implemented in the STOMP simulator. The model includes effects of gas entrapment during aqueous-phase imbibition paths. Gas entrapment during aqueous-phase imbibition will depend on the aqueous saturation and current saturation path. The amount of entrapped gas varies linearly between zero and the gas effective residual saturation with the apparent saturation, which varies between the reversal point from main drainage to one. Gas effective residual saturations are computed using an empirical relationship developed by Land [1968] for aqueous-NAPL systems. In this simplified hysteretic model for aqueous-gas systems, gas can be trapped or free, where free gas refers to continuous volumes which advect freely and trapped gas refers to discontinuous ganglia of gas occluded within the aqueous phase. Occluded gas is assumed to be immobile. The apparent aqueous saturation equals the effective aqueous saturation plus effective trapped gas saturation, as shown in the first Equation below. The effective gas saturation equals the effective trapped and free gas saturations, as shown in the third Equation below. In hysteretic systems, the residual saturation is independent of capillary pressure.

 

 

The saturation functions relate gas-aqueous capillary pressure to apparent aqueous saturations, according to the first and second equation, for the van Genuchten and Brooks and Corey functions, respectively. The effective trapped gas saturation is computed according to the forth Equation, which recognizes that entrapped gas cannot exceed the gas present. Land’s parameter for gas-aqueous interfaces is computed according to the fifth Equation.

 

The "Haverkamp" option:

The Haverkamp et al. (1977) retention is used

 

The Webb Extension option:

To extend the saturation function below the aqueous residual saturation, functional extensions are required. STOMP-CO2 and -CO2e recognizes the Webb (2000) model. This function works with both the van Genuchten and Brooks and Corey characteristics functions, without requiring additional input as the oven-dried head is assumed to be equal to a capillary pressure of 109 Pa (~105 m).

The "Tabular" option:
This option accepts the tabulated retention data. The default is the data of pressure head and saturation data pairs and linear interpolation is used between data points. Other key words such as "water content" if data type is water content and "log" for log-linear interpolation.


 

Symbols

α van Genuchten entry pressure, 1/Pa
Pg gas pressure, Pa
Pl aqueous liquid pressure, Pa
ρl density of aqueous liquid phase, kg/m3
g acceleration of gravity, m/s2 
n van Genuchten n parameter
m van Genuchten m parameter
φ

porosity

ψ Brooks and Corey entry pressure, Pa
λ Brooks and Corey λ parameter
φf

porosity of the fracture material

φm porosity of the matrix material
sl aqueous liquid saturation
sg gas saturation
slf aqueous liquid saturation of the fracture material
slm aqueous liquid saturation of the matrix material
slrf aqueous liquid residual saturation of the fracture material
slrm aqueous liquid residual saturation of the matrix material
slr aqueous liquid residual saturation
θ volumetric water content
θr residual water content
θs saturated water content
h Haverkamp gas entry head, psi
α Haverkamp α parameter
β Haverkamp β parameter

 

References

Brooks, RH and AT Corey. 1966. "Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow," Proc. ASCE J. Irrig. Drain. Div. , 92:61-68.

Fayer, M.J. and C.S. Simmons. 1995. “Modified soil water retention functions for all matric suctions.” WaterResour. Res. 31:1233-1238.

Havekamp, R., M. Vauclin, J. Touma, P.J. Wierenga and G. Vachaud (1977). A comparison of numerical simulation models for one-dimensional infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 285-294.

Klavetter, EA and RR Peters. 1986. Estimation of Hydrologic Properties of Unsaturated Fractured Rock Mass, SAND84-2642, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.

Kaluarachchi, JJ and JC Parker. 1992. "Multiphase Flow with a Simplified Model for Oil Entrapment," Transport in Porous Media, 7:1-14.

Land, CS. 1968. "Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow from Rock Properties," Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., 243:149-156.

Nitao, JJ. 1988. Numerical Modeling of the Thermal and Hydrological Environment around a Nuclear Waste Package Using the Equivalent Continuum Approximation: Horizontal Emplacement, UCID-2144, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.

Parker, JC and RJ Lenhard. 1987. "A Model for Hysteretic Constitutive Relations Governing Multiphase Flow 1. Saturation-Pressure Relations," Water Resources Research, 23(12):2187-2196.

Van Genuchten, MT. 1980. "A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils," Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44:892-898.

Webb, S. W., 2000. “A simple extension of two-phase characteristic curves to include the dry region.” Water Resources Research, 36(6):1425-1430.

 

STOMP User Guide Home

Modules